This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Blackell, M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Lefort and the Problem of Democratic Citizenship

York University in Toronto, Canada; Malaspina University-College in Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada; blackellm{at}mala.bc.ca

To interpret the possibilities of a Lefort-inspired theory of citizenship requires first that we depart from traditional liberal and republican theories of citizenship that conceive of the citizen's attachment to the political order in terms of interest or virtue. A Lefort-inspired theory of citizenship must also reconfigure the object of citizen attachment from an ‘empty place’ of power to an ‘absent-presence’. The nature of modern democratic citizenship is framed in terms of ambivalence as a symptom of the symbolic order of democracy, and the precarious nature of political attachment in modern democracy is read as paralleling the precariousness of the symbolic order of modern democracy. In the face of this ambivalence, the possibilities of a Lefort-inspired theory of citizenship are conceived of explicitly not in terms of identification between competing political principles but in terms of a partial gesture of love to a metaphysical limit of democratic political society.

Key Words: citizenship theory • democratic theory • Claude Lefort • political attachment • political ambivalence

References

• Beiner, R. (1995) Theorizing Citizenship. Albany: SUNY .
• Berkowitz, P. (1999) Virtue and the Making of Modern Liberalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press .
• Constant, B. (1988) Political Writings. New York: Cambridge University Press .
• Fontana, B. (1991) Benjamin Constant and the Post-Revolutionary Mind. New Haven: Yale University Press .
• Galston, W. (1991) Liberal Purposes: Goods, Virtues, and Diversity in the Liberal State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
• Lefort, C. (1988) Democracy and Political Theory. Cambridge: Polity .
• Lefort, C. (2000) Writing: The Political Test. Durham: Duke University Press .
• Macedo, S. (1990) Liberal Virtues: Citizenship, Virtue, and Community in Liberal Constitutionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
• Mouffe, C. (1993) The Return of the Political. New York: Verso .
• Mouffe, C. (1996) ‘Radical Democracy or Liberal Democracy?’, in D. Trend (ed.) Radical Democracy: Identity, Citizenship, and the State. New York: Routledge .
• Mouffe, C. (1999) ‘Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism’ , in Social Research 66(3): 745–758 .
• Mouffe, C. (2000) The Democratic Paradox. London: Verso .
• Rosenblum, N. (1989) ‘Introduction’, in Liberalism and the Moral Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
• Sandel, M. (1996) Democracy's Discontent: America in Search of a Public Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press .
• Shklar, J. (1989) ‘The Liberalism of Fear’, in N. Rosenblum (ed.) Liberalism and the Moral Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .

CiteULike

Connotea

Del.icio.us

Digg

Reddit

Technorati

This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Blackell, M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?